Ideas of Multipolarity in the Conceptual Frame of the Soviet Diplomacy during the Final Phases of the Second World War (1943–1945)
https://doi.org/10.24833/RJWPLN-2024-3-24-45
Аннотация
This article aims to identify the conceptual landscape occupied by ideas of post-war multipolarity within the strategic discourse of Soviet diplomacy during the latter phases of the Second World War. Particular emphasis is placed on the intellectual contributions of two prominent Soviet diplomats, Maxim Litvinov and Ivan Maisky. In the paper, the author draws upon both published and archival source materials including the diaries and records maintained by officials within the Soviet Foreign Office, as well as documents produced by the “Litvinov Commission.”
While the diplomatic theories formulated by Litvinov and Maisky during the years 1943–1945 have been subject to analysis by Russian and international scholars, existing scholarship has for the most part focused on the content and nuances of their perspectives on specific international “questions.” Departing from this convention, this article adopts a methodological approach that seeks to explore the underlying conceptual foundations upon which the ideas of Litvinov and Maisky were constructed. Additionally, the essay introduces a novel dimension by surveying the viewpoints of other Soviet diplomats (Solomon Lozovsky, Boris Shtein, Yakov Surits, and Yevgeny Tarle), who have garnered relatively less scholarly attention.
The author pays special attention to the nature of Litvinov and Maisky’s conceptualization of the international landscape following the war as a multipolar system, although the term “multipolarity” is not explicitly used. The article addresses such issues as how the Soviet diplomats envisioned the post-war security architecture, whether they considered Soviet-American bipolarity inevitable, and what factors and circumstances influenced their foreign policy conceptualizations. The resurgence today of discussions surrounding the trajectory of multipolarity in the 21stcentury underscores the pertinence of this historical inquiry.
The key conclusion of the article is that the conceptual framework embraced by Soviet diplomats in 1943–1945 was not centred on notions of bipolarity or an imminent Cold War. While acknowledging the potential escalation of tensions between the USSR and Western nations led by the United States and Great Britain, they favoured collaboration among the principal powers of the anti-Hitler coalition, grounded in an implicit understanding of their respective “spheres of influence.” Although Soviet Foreign Office officials did not discount the possibility of the formation of a united Anglo-American front against the USSR, they believed that Soviet diplomacy should actively work to prevent such an outcome by capitalizing on the fissures between Washington and London.
Ключевые слова
USSR,
Soviet diplomacy,
Great Patriotic War,
Second World War,
post-war world,
Litvinov,
Maisky,
multipolarity
Список литературы
1. Afiani V.Y. 2016. Problemy reparatsii na Ialtinskoi konferentsii. Po dokumentam lichnogo fonda I.M. Maiskogo v arkhive RAN [The Reparations Issue on the Crimea (Yalta) Conference: Based on Documents from the Personal Provenance Fond of Ivan M. Maisky in the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vestnik arkhivista, 5(14), 45–47. (In Russian.)
2. Aganson O.I. et al. 2020. Vtoraia mirovaia voina i transformatsiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: ot mnogopoliarnosti k bipoliarnomu miru [The Second World War and Transformation of International Relations: From Multipolarity to Bipolar World]. Ed. by L.S. Belousov, A.S. Manykin. Moscow State University. (In Russian.)
3. Ageev A.I. et al. 2014. Velikaia Otechestvennaia voina 1941–1945 godov [The Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945]. Vol. 8. Ed. by V.G. Titov et al. Kuchkovo Pole. (In Russian.)
4. Anichkina V.S. et al. 1979. Sovremennye vneshnepoliticheskie kontseptsii SShA [Contemporary Foreign Policy Conceptions of the USA]. Nauka. (In Russian.)
5. Arzakanian M.T. 2010. SSSR i griadushchaia pobeda soiuznikov v voine: vzgliad iz Velikobritanii [The USSR and the Allies’ Impending Victory in the War: A View from Great Britain). MGIMO Review of International Relations, 5(14), 45–47. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2010-5-14- 45-47 (in Russian).
6. Balandina O.A., Davydov A. Y. 2020. Vlast’, informatsiia i obshchestvo: ikh vzaimosviazi v deiatel’nosti Sovetskogo informbiuro v usloviiakh Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Power, Information and Society in the Framework of the Soviet Information Bureau’s Activities during the Great Patriotic War]. Evraziia. (In Russian.)
7. Baryshnikov V.N., Plenkov O.Y. 2015. Diplomat B.E. Shtein i sovetsko-finliandskie otnosheniia serediny 1930-kh gg. [Diplomat Boris Shtein and Soviet-Finnish Relations in the mid-1930s]. Trudy Kafedry istorii Novogo i noveishego vremeni [Works of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History], 15, 79–103. (In Russian.)
8. Carley M.J. 2019. Tainaiavoina: Zapad protiv Rossii, 1917–1930 [Secret War: The West against Russia, 1917–1930]. Istoricheskaia Literatura. (In Russian.) Filitov A.M. (2023). Germaniia v sovetskom vneshnepoliticheskom planirovanii (1941–1990) [Germany in Soviet Foreign Policy Planning (1941–1990)].Iurait. (In Russian.)
9. Filitov A.M. 1995. V komissiiakh Narkomindela… (In the Commissions of the Soviet Foreign Office…). InO. A. Rzheshevskii (Ed.), Vtoraia mirovaia voina. Aktual’nye problemy [Second World War. Topical Problems] (p. 54–71). Nauka. (In Russian.)
10. Gorozii V.S. 2018. Komissiia M.M. Litvinova po podgotovke mirnykh dogovorov i poslevoennogo ustroistva: plany v otnoshenii Zapadnoi Evropy [Maxim Litvinov’s Commission on Preparation of the Peace Treaties and Post-War Settlement: Plans in Regard of Western Europe]. Klio, 6(138), 123–128. (In Russian.)
11. Islamov T.M., Pokivailova T.A. (2008). Vostochnaia Evropa v silovom pole velikikh derzhav. Transil’vanskii vopros. 1940–1946 gody [Eastern Europe in the Force Field of Great Powers. Transylvanian Question. 1940–1946]. Indrik. (In Russian.)
12. Kaganovich B.S. 2000. E.V. Tarle v Komissii po voprosam mirnykh dogo-vorov i poslevoennogo ustroistva (1943–1945gg.) [Yevgeny Tarle in the Commission of Peace Treaties and Post-War Settlement (1943–1945)]. In B. V. Anan’ich (Ed.), Problemy vsemirnoi istorii: sb. st. v chest’ akademika A.A. Fursenko [Essays on World History: Dedicated to Academician A.A. Fursenko] (p. 351–360). Dmitrii Bulanin. (In Russian.)
13. Kaganovich B.S. 2014. Evgenii Viktorovich Tarle. Istorik I vremia [Yevgeny Viktorovich Tarle. Historian and Time]. European University at St. Petersburg. (In Russian.)
14. Khakhalkina E.V., Zhigalov B.S. 2019. «Zvezdnyi chas» posla I.M. Maiskogo (iiun' 1941 – iiul' 1943 gg.) [The “Finest Hour” of the Ambassador I.M. Maisky (June 1941 – July 1943)]. Voprosy istorii, 12, 27–43. DOI: 10.3116/VoprosyIstorii201912Statyi24 (In Russian.)
15. Khlebnikov P.P. 1984. Neob’’iavlennye voiny SShA [Undeclared U.S. Wars]. Mysl’. (In Russian.)
16. Kholodkovskii K.G. 1991. Mezhdu istinoi i skhemoi [Between Truthand Scheming]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 7, 19–22. (In Russian)
17. Khromushin G.B. 1974. Sovremennyi mir i ideologicheskaia bor’ba [Contemporary World and Ideological Battles].Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. (In Russian.)
18. Kissinger H. A. 1969. American Foreign Policy: Three Essays. W. W. Norton.
19. Kokoshin A.A. 1978. O burzhuaznykh prognozakh razvitiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [On Bourgeois Forecasts for the Development of International Relations]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. (In Russian.)
20. Kunina A.E. 1988. SShA: metodologicheskie problemy istoriografii (praktika issledovanii) [USA: Methodological Problems of Historiography (Practice of Research)]. Nauka. (In Russian.)
21. Magadeev I.E. 2020. «Uroki voiny» i strategicheskoe planirovanie derzhav «Bol'shoi troiki» (1945–1949). [Lessons of World War II and Strategic Planning of the Big Three]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika, 12(3), 45–84. DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-3-45-84 (in Russian)
22. Magadeev I.E. 2023. Prakticheskaia istoriografiia: E.V. Tarle i diskussii po «frantsuzskomu voprosu» v NKID SSSR (1943–1944) [Practical Historiography: Yevgeny Tarle and Discussions on the “French Question” in the Soviet Foreign Office (1943–1944)]. Noveishaia istoriia Rossii, 13(2), 363–375. DOI: 10.21638/spbu24.2023.207 (in Russian)
23. Narinskii M.M. 2010. Sovetskoe rukovodstvo i problema granits i sfery vliianiia SSSR v 1941– 1946 gg. (Soviet State, Frontiers and Spheres of Influence in 1941–1946). InA. V. Torkunov, S. E. Naryshkin (Eds.) 65 let Velikoi Pobedy [Great Victory: 65 Years Ago]. Vol. 3 (p. 52–61). MGIMOUniversity Press. (In Russian).
24. Pechatnov V.O. 2006. Stalin, Ruzvel’t, Trumen: SSSR I SShA v 1940-kh gg.: Dokumental’nye ocherki [Stalin, Roosevelt and Truman: USSR and USA in the 1940s. A Documentary Study]. TERRA–Knizhnyi klub. (In Russian.)
25. Pechatnov V.O. 2009. Uroki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny v voenno-politicheskom planirovanii SShA i SSSR na poslevoennyi period [Lessons of the Second World War in the American and Soviet Military and Political Planning for the Post-War Period]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika, 1, 116–133. (In Russian.)
26. Pechatnov V.O. 2010. Posol SSSR v Velikobritanii I.M. Maisky: Po stranitsam ego dnevnikovykh zapisei [USSR Ambassador to Great Britain Ivan Maisky: From the Pages of His Diaries]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia. №3. P. 187–199. (In Russian.)
27. Pechatnov V.O. 2013. Stalingradskaia bitva i problema vtorogo fronta [The Battle of Stalingrad and the Second Front Problem]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2(29), 86–94. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-2-29-86-94 (in Russian)
28. Petrovskii V.F. 1976. Amerikanskaia vneshnepoliticheskaia mysl’ [American Foreign Policy Thinking]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. (In Russian.)
29. Pikhoia R.G. 2014. «Arkhivnaia revoliutsiia»: dvadtsat’ let spustia [“Archival Revolution”: Twenty Years Later]. Pt. 3. In S. O. Shmidt (Ed.), Arkheograficheskii ezhegodnik (p. 4–22). Nauka. (In Russian.)
30. Pleshakov K. 1991. Nashi natsional’nye interesy v perekhodnyi period [Our National Interests during the Period of Transition]. Mezhdunarodnaia zhizn’, 10, 15–25. (In Russian.)
31. Pozdeeva L.V. 2008. I.M. Maisky i A. Iden [Ivan Maisky and A. Eden]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, 1, 171–184. (In Russian.)
32. Pozharskaia S. P. (2004). I.M. Maisky. In G. N. Sevost’ianov (Ed.), Portrety istorikov. Vremia i sud’by [Portraits of Historians. Time and Destinies] (p. 282–302). Vol. 4. Nauka. (In Russian.)
33. Primakov E.M. et al. 1983. Vostok: rubezh 80-kh godov. Osvobodivshiesia strany v sovremennom mire [The Eat: At the Turn of the 1980s. Liberated Countries in the Contemporary World]. Nauka. (In Russian.)
34. Roberts G. 1999. Ideology, Calculation, and Improvisation: Spheres of Influence and Soviet Foreign Policy 1939–1945. Review of International Studies, 25(4), 655–673.
35. Roberts, G. 2002. Litvinov’s Lost Peace, 1941–1946. Journal of Cold War Studies, 4(2), 23–54.
36. Roberts G. 2006. Stalin’s Wars: from World War to Cold War, 1939–1953. Yale University Press.
37. Roberts G. 2011. Moscow’s Cold War on the Periphery: Soviet Policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943–8. Journal of Contemporary History, 46(1), 58–81.
38. Sal’kov A. P. 2009. SSSR i Triestinskii krizis (mai – iiun’ 1945 g.) [USSR and the Trieste Crisis (May–June 1945)]. In U. K. Korshuk (Ed.). Pratsy gictarychnaga fakul’teta BDU: navuk. zb (p. 128–141).Vol. 4. Belarusian State University Press. (In Russian.)
39. Schweller R. L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. Columbia University Press.
40. Sergunin A. A. 1989). SShA: prezidentskii lobbizm i vneshniaia politika [USA: Presidential Lobbying and Foreign Policy]. Znanie. (In Russian.)
41. Sindeev A. A. 2020. Diplomaticheskii front Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: kontury poslevoennoi Evropy v 1944 g. [The Diplomatic Front of the Great Patriotic War: The Contours of Post-War Europe in 1944]. Sovremennaia Evropa, 3, 158–169. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope32020158169 (in Russian).
42. Sizonenko A. I. 1991. Polpred SSSR Y.Z. Surits [Plenipotentiary Envoy Yakov Surits]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, 3, 100–117. (In Russian.)
43. Sokolov V. V. 2001. I.M. Maisky mezhdu I.V. Stalinym i U. Cherchillem v pervye mesiatsy voiny [Ivan Maisky between Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill during the First Months of the War]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, 6, 18–31. (In Russian)
44. Sokolov V. V. 2002. M.M. Litvinov. In I.S. Ivanov et al (Eds.). Ocherki istorii Ministerstva inostrannykh del Rossii 1802–2002 [Essays on History of the Russian Ministry for Foreign Affairs 1802– 2002] (p. 340–353). Vol. 3. OLMAPress. (In Russian.)
45. Trofimenko G. A. 1976. Skvoz’ prizmu «balansa sil» (kritika sovetologicheskikh kontseptsii sovetsko-amerikanskikh otnoshenii) (Through the “Balance of Power” Lens (Criticising the Sovietology’s Concepts about Soviet-American Relations]. In A .O. Chubar’ian (Ed.). Problemy istorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i ideologicheskaia bor’ba [Problems in the History of International Relations And the Ideological Struggle] (p. 35–74). Nauka. (In Russian.)
46. Vatlin A. Y., Lannik L.V. 2023. Vvedenie [Introduction]. In A. Y. Vatlin, L. V. Lannik, T. Penter (Eds.). Berlinskaia missiia polpreda Ioffe 1918 g. Dokumenty [Berlin Mission of Plenipotentiary Ioffe in 1918. Documents] (p. 3–95). Politicheskaia entsiklopediia (In Russian.)
47. Wohlforth W. 1993. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Cornell University Press.
48. Yakovlev A. G. 1990. Vneshniaia politika KNR: problemy issledovaniia v svete novogo myshleniia [Foreign Policy of the PRC: Problems of Studying in the Light of New Thinking]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, 2, 99–107. (In Russian.)
49. Yakovlev N. N. (Ed.) et al. 1976. SShA: politicheskaia mysl’ i istoriia [USA: Political Thought and History]. Nauka. (In Russian.)
50. Zhigalov B. S. 2014. I. M. Maisky i problema germanskikh reparatsii (1943–1945 gg.) [Ivan Maisky and the Problem of German Reparations (1943–1945)]. Tomsk State University Journal of History, 1(27), 56–63. (In Russian.)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
. Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations. 2024;3(3):24-45. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJWPLN-2024-3-24-45
For citation:
Magadeev I.E. Ideas of Multipolarity in the Conceptual Frame of the Soviet Diplomacy during the Final Phases of the Second World War (1943–1945). Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations. 2024;3(3):24-45. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJWPLN-2024-3-24-45
Просмотров:
182
JATS XML
Послать статью по эл. почте 