Preview

Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations

Advanced search

Syrian Kurds as a Proto-State Actor: From the Insurgent State to Democratic Confederalism

https://doi.org/10.24833/RJWPLN-2022-3-101-121

Abstract

It is estimated that the self-proclaimed Kurdish autonomy in Northeastern Syria accounts for one-third of the country’s territory, and, despite its unrecognized status, it appears to be one of the key players in the Syrian peace settlement and, at the same time, a political hostage to the situation that has developed in Syria as a result of the Civil War. The present article explores the formation of the self-proclaimed autonomy in Northeastern Syria (Rojava, Syrian Kurdistan, the Federation of North-Eastern Syria, the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria [AANES]) and puts forward the thesis of Rojava’s emergence as an insurgent state. The first part of the study analyses its political system through the concept of proto-state actors for the Kurdish Self-Defence Forces (YPG) and the Democratic Union Party (PYD). Due to the inclusiveness of the Kurdish Self-Defence Forces, Kurdish non-state actors (PYD-YPG) have acquired the features of a proto-state, going beyond the definition of the “Syrian wing” of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). The article focuses on the complex and diversified ethnic composition of the local population within the boundaries of the de facto autonomy. This is manifested in the presence of various political actors and movements, including those based on ethnic particularism. It is concluded that such a political structure is fragile due to the interethnic contradictions between the Kurds and the Arabs in the region.

About the Author

K. V. Vertyaev
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS
Russian Federation

Kirill V. Vertyaev – Cand. of Science (Political Science), Senior Research Fellow at Centre of the Near and Middle East

12 Rozhdestvenka Str., Moscow, 107031



References

1. Acun C, Keskin B. 2016. The PKK's branch in Nothem Syria. PYD-YPG. Ankara: SETA. 74 p.

2. Bartenev V. 2018. Pomosh' “khrupkim gosudarstvam” skvoz' prizmu risk-menedjmenta. La­birint ob'yasnitelnyh gipotez [Aiding Fragile States Through the Lens of Risk-management. Labirinth of explanatory Hypotheses]. Mezhdunarodenye protsessy. Vol. 16. No. 4(55). P. 20—41. (In Russ.).

3. Bartolini S. 2005. Restructuring Europe. Centre formation, System building and Political Restruc­turing between the Nation State and the European Union. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 415 p.

4. Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V. (eds.). 2018. Blizhniy Vostok v menyayuschemsya global'nom kontekste. [The Middle East in a Changing Global Context]. Moscow: IV RAN. 555 p. (In Russ.).

5. Bogaturov A.D, Vinogradov A.V. 2002. Anklavno-konglomeratnyj tip razvitiya. Opyt trans­sistemnoy teorii [The “enclave-conglomerate” type of development. Approach to the trans-system theory]. Vostok-Zapad-Rossiya. Sbornik statey. K 70-letiyu akademika N.A. Simonii. Moscow: Pro­gress-Traditsiya. P. 109—128. (In Russ.).

6. Carneiro R. L. 1981. The Chiefdom: Precursor of the State. In: Jones G. D., Kautz R. R., (eds.) The Transition to Statehood in the New World. Cambridge. P. 37—79.

7. Flach A., Ayboga E., Knapp M. 2015. Kurdistan: Realnaya demokratiya v usloviyah vojni i blokady [Kurdistan: The Real Democracy in Conditions of War and Blockade]. Moscow. 350 p. (In Russ.).

8. Flanigan S.T. 2009. For the Love of God: NGOs and Religious Identity in a Violent World. N.Y. 184 p.

9. Giddens A. 2005. Ustroyeniye obschestva. Ocherki teorii strukturatsii [Organization of the Soci­ety. Essays on the Theory of Structuration]. Moscow. 528 p. (In Russ.).

10. Gunter М. 2014. Out of nowhere: The Kurds of Syria in Peace and War. L.: C.Hurt &Co. 120 p.

11. Kashanina T.V. 2004. Proiskhozhdeniye gosudarstva i prava [Origins of the State and the Law] Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 325 p. (In Russ.).

12. Knyazeva S.N. 2009. Istoriya gosudarstva iprava zarubezhnykh stran [History of the state and law of foreign countries]. Moscow. 128 p. (In Russ.).

13. Kwarten L. 2020. Redrawing the Lines in the Sand? Quests for Decentralisation, Regional Au­tonomy and Independence Among Syrian Kurds and South Yemeni Separatists. In: Gervais V., van Genugten S. (eds.) Stabilising the Contemporary Middle East and North Africa: Regional Actors and New Approaches. Palgrave Macmillan. P. 233—257.

14. Lijphart A. 1997. Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh [Democracy in Plural Socie­ties] Moscow: Nauka. 287 p. (In Russ.).

15. Lyubashits V.Ya, Razuvayev N.V. 2018. Evol'utsiya gosudarstva: istoricheskaya dinamika I teorit­icheskaya model [Evolution of the State. Historical Dynamics and Theoretical Model. Moscow. 533 p. (In Russ.).

16. Lukichev P.N., Skorik A.P. 1994. Kvazigosudarstvennost' [Quazi-Statehood]. Polis. Politiches­kiye issledovaniya. No. 5. P. 139—142. (In Russ.).

17. McColl R.W. 1969. The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution. Annals of the American Association of. Geographers. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 613—631.

18. Mampilly Z. C. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. NY and London: Cornell University Press. 320 p.

19. Naumkin V.V, Kuznetsov V.A. 2020. K voprosu o tipologizatsii negosudarstvennykh aktorov na Blizhnem Vostoke [On the Issue of Classification of Non-State Actors in the Middle East]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. Vol. 64. No. 6. P. 104—113. (In Russ.).

20. Ocalan А. 2003. Ozgur Insan Savunmasi [Defense of a Free Human]. Qetin Yayinlari, istanbul. 21 p.

21. Ocalan A. 2010. Demokratik Uygarlik Manifestosu: Ortadogu'da Uygarlik Krizi ve Demokratik Uygarlik Qozumu [Manifesto of the Democratic Civilization: The Crisis of the Civilization in the Middle East and Democratic Civilization Solution]. Istanbul. Mezopotamya Yayinlari. 342 p. (In Turk.).

22. Ocalan А. 2011. Problemypreodoleniya kapitalisticheskogo modernizma idemokratizatsiya. Tsiv­ilizatsiya. Epoha bojestv v maskah i zavualirovannih tsarey [The Problems of Overcoming Capitalist Modernism and Democratization. Civilization. The Era of Masked Deities and Veiled Kings]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 280 p. (In Russ.).

23. Ocalan А. 2014. Sotsiologiya svobody [Sociology of the Liberty]. Vol. 3. Moscow. Zebra E. 479 p.

24. Okrest D., Petrov D., Lebskij M. (eds.). 2017. Zhizn bez gosudarstva: Revolutsiya v Kurdistane [Life without a State: the Revolution in Kurdistan]. Moscow: Common Place. 312 p. (In Russ.).

25. Ozgelik B. 2020. Explaining the Kurdish Democratic Union Party's Self-Governance Practices in Northern Syria, 2012—18. Government and Opposition. Vol. 55. No. 4. P. 690—710.

26. Popov F. 2011. Ot «bezgosudarstvennoy territorii» k “gosudarstvu de-fakto” [From the "state­less territory" to the "de facto state"]. Mezhdunarodenyye protsessy. Vol. 9. No. 2(26). (In Russ.).

27. Schmidinger Th. 2018. Rojava: Revolution, War and the Future of Syria's Kurds. London. 300 p.

28. Stansfield G. 2003. Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Development and Emergent Democracy. Routledge. 280 p.

29. Steiner H. 2009. Left Libertarianism and the Ownership of Natural Resources. Public Reason. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1-8.

30. Szekely О. 2016. Proto-State Realignment and the Arab Spring. Middle East policy. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 75-91.

31. Vasil'yev L. S. 1983. Pmblemy genezisa kitayskogo gosudarstva [Problems of the genesis of the Chinese state] Moscow: Nauka. 327 p. (In Russ.).

32. Vasil'yev L. S. 1980. Protogosudarstvo-chifdom kak politicheskaya struktura [Chiefdom as a political structure]. NarodyAzii iAfriki. No. 6. P. 157-175. (In Russ.).

33. Vertyaev K.V. 2007. Kurdskiy vopros vpolitike Turtsii (konetsXX — nachalo XIX veka) [Kurdish question in Turkish politics (late XX — early XIX centuries)]. Moscow. 254 p. (In Russ.).

34. Vertyaev K.V. 2018. Kurds within the borders of new states under the Sevres (1920) and Lozanne (1923) Treates. In: Naumkin V., Popova I. (eds) The Kurds: Legend of the East. Moscow. P. 242— 258.

35. Vertyaev K.V. 2015. Spetsifika kurdskogo natsional'nogo dvijeniya i ego sovremennaya aktual­izatsiya v Turtsii i Sirii [Specifics of the Kurdish National Movement and its acualization in medern Turkey and Syria]. Natsiii Natsionalizm na musul'manskom Vostoke. Moscow: IV RAN. P. 361—374. (In Russ.).

36. Weller M. 2009. Contested Statehood: Kosovo's Struggle for Independence. Oxford University Press. 328 p.

37. Zvyagel'skaya I.D., Kuznetsov V.A. 2017. Gosudarstvo na Blizhnem Vostoke. Budushcheye nachalos' vchera [State in the Middle East. The future began yesterday]. Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy. Vol. 15. No. 4 (51). P. 6-19. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Vertyaev K.V. Syrian Kurds as a Proto-State Actor: From the Insurgent State to Democratic Confederalism. Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations. 2022;1(3):101-121. https://doi.org/10.24833/RJWPLN-2022-3-101-121

Views: 1387


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-6322 (Online)