Sacralization of Peace by the Choice of Dates for Concluding International Treaties within the Westphalian System
Abstract
Issues of peace have always been important for historical science. However, in recent years, international historiography has started to pay attention to the symbolism and socio-cultural design of peace congresses. The symbolic power of “special days” – whether it is a Christian holiday or an event of exceptional significance – allowed people of early Modernity to express their attitude to reality and power. An analysis of the choice of dates for concluding peace by adversarial states within the Westphalian system demonstrates three consistent options. The first is signing a peace treaty on a Saturday, Sunday, or a Christian holiday. The most striking example of this option is the signing of the Peace of Westphalia itself (the treaties of Münster and Osnabrück on October 24, 1648), on a Saturday – the day before the second Sunday after Trinity. The second option involves a reference to an important event in the past. For example, the Peace in Passarowitz between the Holy Roman Empire and Porta (1718) and the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca between Russia and Turkey (1774) were signed on the same date – July 21, the date when Istanbul and Peter the Great signed the Treaty of the Pruth in 1711. Since the age of the Enlightenment, when the “Right to Peace” began to compete with the “Right to War” in political theories, the date of peace could be directly determined by the end of negotiations. Sometimes the conclusion of peace became a Christian holiday. Peter the Great decided to consecrate the day of the conclusion of the Nystad Peace Treaty by transferring the relics of the Holy Grand Duke Alexander Nevsky from Vladimir to the new Russian capital – St. Petersburg. The conclusion of peace in this case was used as a tool of social constructivism, implemented through modelling. The political idea was symbolically grounded in significant historical or religious dates. Combining the historical precedent, the Christian holiday and the end of the war emphasized the sacred nature of Peace as the highest social value.
About the Author
L. I. IvoninaRussian Federation
Liudmila I. Ivonina – Dr. Sci. (History), Professor, Department of Universal History and International Relations
4, Przevalskogo Street, Smolensk, 214000
References
1. Blanning T. 2002. The Power of Culture and the Culture of Power: Old Regime Europe, 1660– 1789. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 479 p.
2. Bruin R.E. de, Haven C. van der, Jensen L., Onnekink D. (Eds.) 2015. Performances of Peace: Utrecht 1713. Leiden: Brill.
3. Einstein А. 1920. Relativity, the Special and the General Theory: A Popular Exposition. London: Methuen. 184 p.
4. Peters M. 2011. The Peace of Passarowitz in the Historical Sciences, 1718–1829. Ingrao Ch. et al., eds. The Peace of Passarowitz, 1718. West Lafayette/Indiana: Purdue University Press. P. 39–52.
5. Bely L.1994. Le cardinal de Polignac, courtisan ou negociateur? Cahiers de Saint-Simon. №22. P. 7–16. (In French)
6. Dingel I., Paulmann J., Schnettger M., Wrede M. (Hrsg.). 2018. Theatrum Belli – Theatrum Pacis. Konflikte und Konfliktregelungen in fruehneuzeitlichen Europa. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. 320 S. (In German)
7. Duchhardt H. 2019. Friedens-Miniaturen. Zur Kulturgeschichte und Ikonographie des Friedens in der Vormoderne. Munster: Aschendorff Verlag. 184 S. (In German)
8. Duchhardt H., Espenhorst M. (Hrsg.) 2013. Utrecht-Rastatt-Baden 1712–1714. Ein europaeisches Friedenswerk am Ende des Zeitalters Ludwigs XIV. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. 419 S. (In German)
9. Fouillee A. 1908. Morale des idees-forces. Paris: Felix Alcan. 391 p. (In French)
10. Kaulbach H.M. (Hrsg). 2013. Friedensbilder in Europa 1450–1815. Kunst der Diplomatie, Diplomatie der Kunst. Berlin/Munchen. 160 S. (In German)
11. Klessman B. 2007. Bellum solemne. Formen und Funktionen europaischer Kriegserklarungen des 17. Jahrhunderts. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. 275 S. (In German)
12. Schaller H.M. 1974. Der Heilige Tag als Termin mittelalterliche Staatsakte. Deutsches Archiv fur Erforschung des Mittelalters. Bd. 30. S. 1–24. (In German)
13. Schild G., Schindling A. (Hrsg.) 2009. Kriegserfahrungen. Krieg und Gesellschaſt in der Neuzeit. Paderborn. 227 S. (In German)
14. Almond G.A., Verba S. 2010. Grazdanskaja kultura. Podhod k izucheniju politicheskoi kulturi [The Civil Сulture. The Method to Study of the Political Culture]. Politeia – A Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics. No. 2, p. 122–144. (In Russian).
15. Soloviev S.M. 1998. Istorija Rossiji s drevnejshih vremen [The History of Russia since Ancient Times]. Т.17–18. Мoscow: Golos; Kolokol – Press. 708 p. (In Russian).
16. Vinogradov V.N. 2000. Kuchuk-Kaynardzhijskij mir – okna na Balkani [The Peace of Kuchuk-Kaynardzhi – Windows to the Balkans]. In: V.N. Vinogradov (ed.) Vek Ekaterini II. Dela Balkanskije [The Age of Catherine II. Balkan affairs]. Мoscow: Nauka. P. 115–122. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Ivonina L.I. Sacralization of Peace by the Choice of Dates for Concluding International Treaties within the Westphalian System. Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations. 2022;1(1-2):175-185.