mgimorusjirlRussian Journal of World Politics and Law of NationsRussian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations2949-6322МГИМО МИД России10.24833/RJWPLN-2024-2-24-34mgimorusjirl-70Research ArticleModern International AffairsWhen and Why the Doctrine of a “Rules-based International Order” EmergedNefedovB. I.

Boris I. Nefedov – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of International Relations

boris-nefedov@mail.ruNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation202417022026322434Copyright © Nefedov B.I., 20262026Nefedov B.I.Nefedov B.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/70

It is no understatement to say that the “rules-based international order” doctrine, as opposed to the “international order based on law,” emerged as one of the most debated concepts in global politics during in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. This concept presents a framework where general rules of conduct for states, though not jus cogens under general international law, are considered legally binding for all states and other participants in international relations. Consequently, it challenges the traditionally recognized supremacy of international law in governing these relations, seeking to erode established practices of international law making. This doctrine is actively used by leading Western powers to justify their political positions and accuse strategic competitors of refusing to adhere to these “rules,” which they have deemed legally binding. Understanding the essence and origin of this doctrine is crucial in unravelling its significance.

rules-based international orderinternational order based on lawliberal international orderunipolaritypolycentricityReferencesAlekseev S.S. 1989. Obshhie dozvoleniya I obshhie zaprety` vsovetskomprave [General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law]. Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian.)Alekseev S.S. 1989. Obshhie dozvoleniya I obshhie zaprety` vsovetskomprave [General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law]. Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian.)Allison G. 2018. Mif o liberal’nom poryadke. Ot istoricheskoj sluchajnosti k obshheprinyatomu mneniyu [The myth of the liberal order. From historical accident to conventional wisdom]. Russia in Global Affairs. No 16(4). P. 174–184. (In Russian.)Allison G. 2018. Mif o liberal’nom poryadke. Ot istoricheskoj sluchajnosti k obshheprinyatomu mneniyu [The myth of the liberal order. From historical accident to conventional wisdom]. Russia in Global Affairs. No 16(4). P. 174–184. (In Russian.)Chalmers M. 2019. Which Rules? Why There is No Single ‘Rules-Based International System’. Royal United Services Institute.Chalmers M. 2019. Which Rules? Why There is No Single ‘Rules-Based International System’. Royal United Services Institute.Dugard J. 2023. The choice before us: International law or a ‘rules-based International order’. Leiden Journal of International Law. No 36. P. 223–232.Dugard J. 2023. The choice before us: International law or a ‘rules-based International order’. Leiden Journal of International Law. No 36. P. 223–232.Entin M., Entina E. 2017. Ot mirovogo liberal`nogo poryadka k normalizacii mezhdunarodny`x otnoshenij [From Liberal World Order to Normalization of International Relations]. World Economy and International Relations. No 61(12). P. 5–17. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-12-5-17 (In Russian.)Entin M., Entina E. 2017. Ot mirovogo liberal`nogo poryadka k normalizacii mezhdunarodny`x otnoshenij [From Liberal World Order to Normalization of International Relations]. World Economy and International Relations. No 61(12). P. 5–17. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-12-5-17 (In Russian.)Grinin L.E. 2015. Global`ny`e processy` I kontury` novogomirovogoporyadka [Global processes and the contours of a new world order]. Filosofiya I obshhestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No 3–4(77). P. 7–33. (In Russian.)Grinin L.E. 2015. Global`ny`e processy` I kontury` novogomirovogoporyadka [Global processes and the contours of a new world order]. Filosofiya I obshhestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No 3–4(77). P. 7–33. (In Russian.)Hosoya Y. 2019. Defending the Liberal International Order: The UK–Japan Partnership in an Uncertain World. In J. Nilsson-Wright (Ed.), The UK and Japan: Forging a Global and Proactive Partnership. P. 73–83. Royal Institute of International Affairs.Hosoya Y. 2019. Defending the Liberal International Order: The UK–Japan Partnership in an Uncertain World. In J. Nilsson-Wright (Ed.), The UK and Japan: Forging a Global and Proactive Partnership. P. 73–83. Royal Institute of International Affairs.Ikenberry J. G. 2010. The Liberal International Order and its Discontents. Journal of International Studies. No 3(38). P. 512.Ikenberry J. G. 2010. The Liberal International Order and its Discontents. Journal of International Studies. No 3(38). P. 512.Kalamanov V.A. 2016. Formirovanie novy`x global`ny`x «Praviligry`»: rol` Rossii [The formation of the new global “Rules of the game”: The role of Russia]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. No 1. P. 95–113. (In Russian.)Kalamanov V.A. 2016. Formirovanie novy`x global`ny`x «Praviligry`»: rol` Rossii [The formation of the new global “Rules of the game”: The role of Russia]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. No 1. P. 95–113. (In Russian.)Kroenig M., Cimmino J. 2021. Global Strategy 2021: An Allied Strategy for China. Atlantic Council. Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security.Kroenig M., Cimmino J. 2021. Global Strategy 2021: An Allied Strategy for China. Atlantic Council. Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security.Kulikov M.A. 2022. Manipulirovanie yuridicheskimi celyami I sredstvami v pravotvorcheskom processei ego rezul`taty`[Manipulation of legal goals and means in the lawmaking process and its results]. Legal science and law enforcement practice. No 3(61). P. 6–14. (In Russian.)Kulikov M.A. 2022. Manipulirovanie yuridicheskimi celyami I sredstvami v pravotvorcheskom processei ego rezul`taty`[Manipulation of legal goals and means in the lawmaking process and its results]. Legal science and law enforcement practice. No 3(61). P. 6–14. (In Russian.)Lavrov S.V. 2021. O prave, pravax I pravilax [On the law, rights and rules]. Russia in Global Affairs. No 4(110). P. 8–20. (In Russian.)Lavrov S.V. 2021. O prave, pravax I pravilax [On the law, rights and rules]. Russia in Global Affairs. No 4(110). P. 8–20. (In Russian.)Nefedov B.I. 2021. Ponyatie «pravila» v doktrine «mezhdunarodnogo poryadka, osnovannogo na pravilah» [The concept of “rules” in the doctrine of a “rules-based world (international) order”]. Russia and the Contemporary World. No 3. P. 6–21. (In Russian.)Nefedov B.I. 2021. Ponyatie «pravila» v doktrine «mezhdunarodnogo poryadka, osnovannogo na pravilah» [The concept of “rules” in the doctrine of a “rules-based world (international) order”]. Russia and the Contemporary World. No 3. P. 6–21. (In Russian.)Raymond G., Nasu H., Seng Tan S., McLaughlin R. et al. 2017. Prospects for the Rules-Based Global Order. Australian National University. Strategic and Defense Studies Centre.Raymond G., Nasu H., Seng Tan S., McLaughlin R. et al. 2017. Prospects for the Rules-Based Global Order. Australian National University. Strategic and Defense Studies Centre.Scott S. 1994. International Law as Ideology: Theorizing the Relationship between International Law and International Politics. European Journal of International Law. No 5(3). P. 313–325.Scott S. 1994. International Law as Ideology: Theorizing the Relationship between International Law and International Politics. European Journal of International Law. No 5(3). P. 313–325.Scott S. 2018. The Decline of International Law as a Normative Ideal. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. No 49(4). P. 630–631.Scott S. 2018. The Decline of International Law as a Normative Ideal. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. No 49(4). P. 630–631.Sellars K. 2018. Rules or Law? Kenneth Bailey and the Law of the Sea. Australian Outlook. Online journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs.Sellars K. 2018. Rules or Law? Kenneth Bailey and the Law of the Sea. Australian Outlook. Online journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs.Voronin E.R. 2020. Liberal`ny`j poryadok, osnovanny`j na «pravilax», imezhdunarodnoepravo [A liberal order based on “rules” and international law]. The International Affairs. No 2. P. 88–95. (In Russian.)Voronin E.R. 2020. Liberal`ny`j poryadok, osnovanny`j na «pravilax», imezhdunarodnoepravo [A liberal order based on “rules” and international law]. The International Affairs. No 2. P. 88–95. (In Russian.)Vylegzhanin A.N., Nefedov B.I., Voronin E.R., Magomedova O.S., Zotova P.K. 2021. The Term “Rules-based International Order” in International Legal Discourses. Moscow Journal of International Law. No 2. P. 35–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-2-35-60.Vylegzhanin A.N., Nefedov B.I., Voronin E.R., Magomedova O.S., Zotova P.K. 2021. The Term “Rules-based International Order” in International Legal Discourses. Moscow Journal of International Law. No 2. P. 35–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-2-35-60.Ward A. 2019. “Adapt or Die”, Ideas for Modernizing the Rules-Based International Order. Chatham House Expert Perspectives. P. 5.Ward A. 2019. “Adapt or Die”, Ideas for Modernizing the Rules-Based International Order. Chatham House Expert Perspectives. P. 5.Weber M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. W. Hodge. 403 p.Weber M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. W. Hodge. 403 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.