mgimorusjirlRussian Journal of World Politics and Law of NationsRussian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations2949-6322МГИМО МИД России10.24833/RJWPLN-2023-3-21-36mgimorusjirl-50Research ArticleInternational Law and International BodiesHistorical Origins of the International Law Doctrines in Latin America (19th–20th Centuries)GolubevaM. V.

Marina V. Golubeva – Postgraduate student, Department of International Law

6a, Vorobiyovskoye shosse, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119285

marinagolubeva@inbox.ruRussian Foreign Trade Academy of the Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian FederationRussian Federation202329102024232136Copyright © Golubeva M.V., 20242024Golubeva M.V.Golubeva M.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/50

The expansion of the community of Latin American states that achieved independence from their European colonizers was a new historical fact that contributed to the evolution of international law. The principles enshrined today in universal international legal acts were proclaimed on the basis of Latin American doctrinal thought and international diplomatic practice. International law is often viewed from a Eurocentric point of view, which means that little attention is paid to the influence of Latin American doctrine on the development of international law at the universal level. Therefore, it seems appropriate to shine a light on the issue of the contribution of Latin American states to the formation of international law and international legal consciousness.

The materials used for the study were the international legal norms of universal and regional nature, as well as the works of Russian and Latin American scholars. When writing the article, general and particular scientific methods were used, namely, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, and the historical method.

The article reveals the origins of the doctrines of international law developed by influential Latin American lawyers, statesmen and political figures in the 19th–20th centuries. These doctrines had a significant impact on the formation and development of international law both in Latin America and in the world as a whole, and influenced the development of positions of Latin American states in the international arena.

The article substantiates the conclusion that modern international law must be considered with due account of the significant contribution of Latin American states to its evolution at the universal level. It also reveals the interconnection of the principles in the doctrines of Latin American lawyers and state figures that were included in the system of international law at the universal level.

English translation from the Russian text: Golubeva M. V. 2023. Istoricheskie istoki doktrin mezhdunarodnogo prava v Latinskoy Amerike (XIX–XX vv.). Moskovskiy Zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo Prava [Moscow Journal of  International Law]. No. 2. P. 63–76. https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2023-2-63-76

doctrineinternational lawLatin Americatreatiesinstitutionsprinciplesuse of forcenon-interference in the internal affairs of statesrecognition of governmentsReferencesÁlvarez S. T. 2021. Un continente en el sistema internacional. Notas sobre la soberanía estatal desde América Latina. De Doctrinas a Teorías. Revista de Historia Americana y Argentina. 56(2). P. 233–273. (In Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.44.018Álvarez S. T. 2021. Un continente en el sistema internacional. Notas sobre la soberanía estatal desde América Latina. De Doctrinas a Teorías. Revista de Historia Americana y Argentina. 56(2). P. 233–273. (In Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.44.018Brum B. 1920. Solidaridad Americana. Montevideo. 32 p. (In Spanish).Brum B. 1920. Solidaridad Americana. Montevideo. 32 p. (In Spanish).Calvo C. 1868. Derecho internacional teórico y práctico de Europa y América. Tomo Primero. D’Amyot. 1868. 521 p. (In Spanish).Calvo C. 1868. Derecho internacional teórico y práctico de Europa y América. Tomo Primero. D’Amyot. 1868. 521 p. (In Spanish).Cançado Trindade A. A., Moreno A. M. 2003a. Doctrina Latinoamericana del Derecho Internacional. Tomo I. San José, C. R.: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. 64 p. (In Spanish).Cançado Trindade A. A., Moreno A. M. 2003a. Doctrina Latinoamericana del Derecho Internacional. Tomo I. San José, C. R.: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. 64 p. (In Spanish).Cançado Trindade A. A., Moreno A. M. 2003b. Doctrina Latinoamericana del Derecho Internacional. Tomo II. San José, C. R.: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. 66 p. (In Spanish).Cançado Trindade A. A., Moreno A. M. 2003b. Doctrina Latinoamericana del Derecho Internacional. Tomo II. San José, C. R.: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. 66 p. (In Spanish).Cerrano C. 2019. El impacto de la doctrina Larreta en la política interna Uruguaya (1945– 1946). Revista de la Facultad de Derecho. No. 47. P. 1–32. (In Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2019n47a12Cerrano C. 2019. El impacto de la doctrina Larreta en la política interna Uruguaya (1945– 1946). Revista de la Facultad de Derecho. No. 47. P. 1–32. (In Spanish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2019n47a12Devés E., Álvarez S. T., eds. 2020. Problemáticas internacionales y mundiales desde el pensamiento latinoamericano Teorías, Escuelas, Conceptos, Doctrinas, Figuras. Santiago de Chile : Ariadna Ediciones. 338 p. (In Spanish).Devés E., Álvarez S. T., eds. 2020. Problemáticas internacionales y mundiales desde el pensamiento latinoamericano Teorías, Escuelas, Conceptos, Doctrinas, Figuras. Santiago de Chile : Ariadna Ediciones. 338 p. (In Spanish).Díaz de Zamora E., Miró Colmenárez P. J. 2022. Critica sobre la institución de reconocimiento de gobiernos a la luz de dos gobiernos que reclaman su legitimidad (Venezuela). Revista de Direito Brasileira. 31(12). P. 125–150. (In Spanish). DOI: doi.org/10.26668/IndexLaw-Journals/2358-1352/2022.v31i12.8465Díaz de Zamora E., Miró Colmenárez P. J. 2022. Critica sobre la institución de reconocimiento de gobiernos a la luz de dos gobiernos que reclaman su legitimidad (Venezuela). Revista de Direito Brasileira. 31(12). P. 125–150. (In Spanish). DOI: doi.org/10.26668/IndexLaw-Journals/2358-1352/2022.v31i12.8465Drago L. M. 1906. Cobro coercitivo de deudas públicas. Buenos Aires: Buenos Coni hermanos, Editores. 169 p. (In Spanish).Drago L. M. 1906. Cobro coercitivo de deudas públicas. Buenos Aires: Buenos Coni hermanos, Editores. 169 p. (In Spanish).Erpyleva N. Y., Get'man-Pavlova I. V., Kasatkina A. S. 2021. Vnutriotraslevoy sposob kodifikatsii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava (na primere stran Latinskoy Ameriki) [Intra-Branch Method of Codifying Private International Law (the Case of Latin American States)]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. No. 2. P. 204–235. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2021.2.204.235Erpyleva N. Y., Get'man-Pavlova I. V., Kasatkina A. S. 2021. Vnutriotraslevoy sposob kodifikatsii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava (na primere stran Latinskoy Ameriki) [Intra-Branch Method of Codifying Private International Law (the Case of Latin American States)]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. No. 2. P. 204–235. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2021.2.204.235Farkhutdinov I. Z. 2015. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o printsipe neprimeneniya sily ili ugrozy siloy: teoriya i praktika [International Law on the Principle of the Non-Use of Force or Threat of Force: Past and Present]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 11. P. 34–38. (In Russian).Farkhutdinov I. Z. 2015. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o printsipe neprimeneniya sily ili ugrozy siloy: teoriya i praktika [International Law on the Principle of the Non-Use of Force or Threat of Force: Past and Present]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 11. P. 34–38. (In Russian).Jiménez de Aréchaga E. 1983. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo [El Derecho internacional contemporáneo]. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 480 p. (In Russian).Jiménez de Aréchaga E. 1983. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo [El Derecho internacional contemporáneo]. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 480 p. (In Russian).Lorences M. 2015. Las doctrinas Calvo y Drago: un verdadero aporte a la politica y el derecho internacional latinoamericano. El Derecho: Diario de doctrina y jurisprudencia. No. 13.750. P. 1–3. (In Spanish).Lorences M. 2015. Las doctrinas Calvo y Drago: un verdadero aporte a la politica y el derecho internacional latinoamericano. El Derecho: Diario de doctrina y jurisprudencia. No. 13.750. P. 1–3. (In Spanish).Mamedov L. R. 2021. Doktrina Kal'vo i printsip ischerpaniya vnutrennikh sredstv pravovoy zashchity [The Calvo Doctrine and the Principle of the Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 7. P. 68–69. (In Russian).Mamedov L. R. 2021. Doktrina Kal'vo i printsip ischerpaniya vnutrennikh sredstv pravovoy zashchity [The Calvo Doctrine and the Principle of the Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 7. P. 68–69. (In Russian).Mendoza Bremauntz E. et al. 2010. La Revolución Mexicana a 100 años de su inicio. Pensamiento social y jurídico. Coyoacán, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 350 p. (In Spanish).Mendoza Bremauntz E. et al. 2010. La Revolución Mexicana a 100 años de su inicio. Pensamiento social y jurídico. Coyoacán, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 350 p. (In Spanish).Menezes W. 2010. Derecho internacional en América Latina. Brasília: FUNAG. 368 p. (In Spanish)Menezes W. 2010. Derecho internacional en América Latina. Brasília: FUNAG. 368 p. (In Spanish)Ruda J. M. 1992. Saavedra Lamas С. El apogeo de la política exterior Argentina. Buenos Aires Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales. 57 p. (In Spanish).Ruda J. M. 1992. Saavedra Lamas С. El apogeo de la política exterior Argentina. Buenos Aires Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales. 57 p. (In Spanish).Sepúlveda C. 2009. Derecho Internacional Público. 26 edición. México. 748 p. (In Spanish).Sepúlveda C. 2009. Derecho Internacional Público. 26 edición. México. 748 p. (In Spanish).Shumilov V. M. 2014. Vzglyad na istoriyu mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i mezhdunarodnogo prava v kontekste tsivilizatsionnogo podkhoda [View on the History of International Relations and International Law in a Context of the Civilization Approach]. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 46–64. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2014-3-46-64Shumilov V. M. 2014. Vzglyad na istoriyu mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i mezhdunarodnogo prava v kontekste tsivilizatsionnogo podkhoda [View on the History of International Relations and International Law in a Context of the Civilization Approach]. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 46–64. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2014-3-46-64Tah Ayala E. D. 2021. El principio de no intervención en América Latina: el corolario Roosevelt y la Doctrina Drago. Intersticios sociales. No. 21. P. 173–195. (In Spanish).Tah Ayala E. D. 2021. El principio de no intervención en América Latina: el corolario Roosevelt y la Doctrina Drago. Intersticios sociales. No. 21. P. 173–195. (In Spanish).Villarroel Peña Y. U. 2011. América Latina y su papel en la configuración del derecho internacional. Politeia. 34(46). P. 111–131. (In Spanish).Villarroel Peña Y. U. 2011. América Latina y su papel en la configuración del derecho internacional. Politeia. 34(46). P. 111–131. (In Spanish).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.