<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimorusjirl</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2949-6322</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО МИД России</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/RJWPLN-2022-3-122-137</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimorusjirl-27</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Problems of Separatism and Self-determination</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Problems of Separatism and Self-determination</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Towards a Draft Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Self-determination and Forms of Its Realization</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-5379</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kagramanov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Azer Kagramanov – Cand. Sci. (Law), Lecturer at the Department of Practical Jurisprudence</p><p>9 ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">gg.azaro@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>137</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Kagramanov A., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Kagramanov A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kagramanov A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/27">https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/27</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. This article elaborates on the idea of Professor Y.A. Reshetov, who published a Draft Convention on the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination in the Moscow Journal of International Law. The Draft Convention represents one of the first attempts to draw attention to the problem of the limits of self-determination in plural states, the forms of implementation and the main subjects of the right of self-determination. The purpose of the study is to develop the relevant ideas of Y.A. R.Reshetov, as well as to introduce new ideas, taking into account the evolving processes of the realization of the right to self-determination in the modern world.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Material and methods. The study is based on international legal instruments, the advi­sory opinions of the International Court of Justice, the jurisprudence of other interna­tional legal bodies and contemporary research of Russian and international scholars. The methods used in this study are: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, compari­son, classification, systematization, prediction, as well as comparative and formal legal approaches.</p></sec><sec><title>Research results</title><p>Research results. The territorial disputes resulting from ethnic, regional and local conflicts are among the most pressing problems in international relations. It is extremely important for any multi-ethnic state, including Russia, to have a genuine scientific awareness of the principle of equality and the self-determination of peoples, adequate forms of its implementation, and how to structure ethnic identity in the system of civil identity. Exploring well-founded solutions to the matters involved will help consolidate world public opinion and ultimately develop an appropriate international legal mechanism under the auspices of the United Nations.</p><p>Discussion and conclusion. The article analyses the evolution of the idea of the self-de­termination of peoples, the place of the principle of equal rights and the self-determination of peoples in the system of basic principles of international law. With reference to the range of subjects of the right to self-determination, the specifics of secession, the institutions of uti possidetis juris and delays in secession, as well as questions on the forms and criteria of self-determination of the principal subjects, and the phenomenon of “unrecognized states,” the author presents a Draft Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination and the Modalities for its Implementation.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>right to self-determination</kwd><kwd>principles of international law</kwd><kwd>people</kwd><kwd>nation</kwd><kwd>small and indigenous peoples</kwd><kwd>national minorities</kwd><kwd>declaration on the right to self-determination of peoples</kwd><kwd>uti possidetis juris</kwd><kwd>temporary secession</kwd><kwd>unrecognized states</kwd><kwd>criteria for self-determination</kwd><kwd>subjects of the right to self-determination</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aleksanyan S.R. 2017. K voprosu o teorii remedial'noi setsessii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave (On Theory of Remedial Secession in Contemporary Interna-tional Law). Moscow Journal of International Law. No.4. P. 141-150. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-4-141-150</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aleksanyan S.R. 2017. K voprosu o teorii remedial'noi setsessii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave (On Theory of Remedial Secession in Contemporary Interna-tional Law). Moscow Journal of International Law. No.4. P. 141-150. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-4-141-150</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anufrieva L.P. 2021. Printsipy v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave (nekotorye voprosy ponyatiya, prirody, genezisa, sushchnosti i soderzhaniya) (Principles in Modern International Law (Certain Issues of Concept, Nature, Genesis, Substance and Scope)). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 1. P. 6-27. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-1-6-27</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anufrieva L.P. 2021. Printsipy v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave (nekotorye voprosy ponyatiya, prirody, genezisa, sushchnosti i soderzhaniya) (Principles in Modern International Law (Certain Issues of Concept, Nature, Genesis, Substance and Scope)). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 1. P. 6-27. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-1-6-27</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brownle I. 1990. Principles of Public International Law. 4th edition Oxford: Oxford University Press. 800 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brownle I. 1990. Principles of Public International Law. 4th edition Oxford: Oxford University Press. 800 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crawford J. 2007. The Creation of States in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 870 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228423.001.0001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crawford J. 2007. The Creation of States in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 870 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228423.001.0001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golubok S.A. 2011. O sootvetstvii mezhdunarodnomu pravu odnostoronnei Deklaratsii nezavisimosti Kosovo. Konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON ot 22 iyulya 2010 g. (On the Conformity with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo. Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 July 2010). Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. No.1. P. 21-30. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golubok S.A. 2011. O sootvetstvii mezhdunarodnomu pravu odnostoronnei Deklaratsii nezavisimosti Kosovo. Konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON ot 22 iyulya 2010 g. (On the Conformity with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo. Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 July 2010). Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. No.1. P. 21-30. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hartwig M. 2013. Konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON po voprosu o Deklaratsii nezavisimosti Kosovo (Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Declaration of Independence of Kosovo). Daidzhest publichnogo prava. No. 2. P. 121-155. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hartwig M. 2013. Konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON po voprosu o Deklaratsii nezavisimosti Kosovo (Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Declaration of Independence of Kosovo). Daidzhest publichnogo prava. No. 2. P. 121-155. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hilpold P. 1998. Zum Jahr der indigenen Volker eine Bestandsaufnahme zur Rechtslage. - Zeitschrift fur vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft. 97(1). P. 30-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hilpold P. 1998. Zum Jahr der indigenen Volker eine Bestandsaufnahme zur Rechtslage. - Zeitschrift fur vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft. 97(1). P. 30-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jankov F., Coric V. 2007. The legality of Uti Possidetis in Definition of Kosovo's Legal Status. Conference Paper. 2nd European Society of International Law. 32 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jankov F., Coric V. 2007. The legality of Uti Possidetis in Definition of Kosovo's Legal Status. Conference Paper. 2nd European Society of International Law. 32 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Konyukhova I.A. 2006. Mezhdunarodnoe i konstitutsionnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika vzaimodeistviya (International and constitutional law: theory and practice of interaction). Moscow: Formula prava Publ. 493 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konyukhova I.A. 2006. Mezhdunarodnoe i konstitutsionnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika vzaimodeistviya (International and constitutional law: theory and practice of interaction). Moscow: Formula prava Publ. 493 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krylov S.B. 1960. Istoriya sozdaniya Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii. Razrabotka teksta Ustava Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii (1944-1945) (History of the United Nations. Drafting of the Charter of the United Nations (1944-1945)). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IMO Publ. 343 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krylov S.B. 1960. Istoriya sozdaniya Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii. Razrabotka teksta Ustava Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii (1944-1945) (History of the United Nations. Drafting of the Charter of the United Nations (1944-1945)). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IMO Publ. 343 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lauterpacht H. 1952. Oppenheim's International Law. Vol. II: Disputes, War and Neutrality. 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green &amp; Co. 939 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lauterpacht H. 1952. Oppenheim's International Law. Vol. II: Disputes, War and Neutrality. 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green &amp; Co. 939 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lijphart A. 1997. Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration In Lijphart A. (ed.) Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh: sravnitel'noe issledovanie. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. 297 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lijphart A. 1997. Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration In Lijphart A. (ed.) Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh: sravnitel'noe issledovanie. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. 297 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lubskii A.V. 2005. Konfliktogennye faktory na yuge Rossii: metodologiya issledovaniya i sotsial'nye realii (Conflict Factors in the South of Russia: Research Methodology and Social Realities.). Rostov-on-Donu: SKNTs VSh Publ. 192 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lubskii A.V. 2005. Konfliktogennye faktory na yuge Rossii: metodologiya issledovaniya i sotsial'nye realii (Conflict Factors in the South of Russia: Research Methodology and Social Realities.). Rostov-on-Donu: SKNTs VSh Publ. 192 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirzaev F.S. 2015. Printsip uti possidetis: istoriya zarozhdeniya (Historical Background of the Principle uti possidetis juris). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 2. P. 57-73. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2014-4-56-77</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirzaev F.S. 2015. Printsip uti possidetis: istoriya zarozhdeniya (Historical Background of the Principle uti possidetis juris). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 2. P. 57-73. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2014-4-56-77</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O'Meara D. 1992. Der Mensch als politisches Lebewesen. Zum Verhaltnis zwischen Platon und Aristoteles. – Der Mensch - ein politisches Tier? Essays zur politischen Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Reclam, Ditzingen. P. 1425.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O'Meara D. 1992. Der Mensch als politisches Lebewesen. Zum Verhaltnis zwischen Platon und Aristoteles. – Der Mensch - ein politisches Tier? Essays zur politischen Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Reclam, Ditzingen. P. 1425.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ott M. 2008. Das Recht auf Sezession als AusfluB des Selbstbestimmungsrechts der Volker. Berlin: Berliner Wissen- schafts-Verlag. 536 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ott M. 2008. Das Recht auf Sezession als AusfluB des Selbstbestimmungsrechts der Volker. Berlin: Berliner Wissen- schafts-Verlag. 536 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov F.A. 2006. Sravnitel'nyi analiz deistvuyushchikh zon rasprostraneniya setsessionizma na territorii Afriki i Ameriki (Comparative analysis of operating zones of spread of secessionism on territory of Africa and America). Vestnik molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov”. 3. P. 98-103. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov F.A. 2006. Sravnitel'nyi analiz deistvuyushchikh zon rasprostraneniya setsessionizma na territorii Afriki i Ameriki (Comparative analysis of operating zones of spread of secessionism on territory of Africa and America). Vestnik molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov”. 3. P. 98-103. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Priznanie v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. Priznanie novykh gosudarstv i pravitel'stv. 1975. In D.I.Feldman (ed.) Recognition in modern international law. Recognition of new states and governments.. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 167 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Priznanie v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. Priznanie novykh gosudarstv i pravitel'stv. 1975. In D.I.Feldman (ed.) Recognition in modern international law. Recognition of new states and governments.. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 167 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reshetov Yu.A. 2000. K proektu Konventsii o prave narodov na samoopredelenie (To the draft Convention on the Right of Peoples to Self-determination). Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 417-419. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reshetov Yu.A. 2000. K proektu Konventsii o prave narodov na samoopredelenie (To the draft Convention on the Right of Peoples to Self-determination). Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 417-419. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M. 1986. Title to Territory in Africa International Legal Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 320 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253792.001.0001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M. 1986. Title to Territory in Africa International Legal Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 320 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253792.001.0001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tolstykh V.L. 2017. Gosudarstvo v istoricheskom i mezhdunarodno-pravovom kontekste (State in Historical and International Legal Context). Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2. P. 18-28. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-18-28</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tolstykh V.L. 2017. Gosudarstvo v istoricheskom i mezhdunarodno-pravovom kontekste (State in Historical and International Legal Context). Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2. P. 18-28. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-18-28</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
