<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimorusjirl</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of World Politics and Law of Nations</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2949-6322</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГИМО МИД России</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/RJWPLN-2022-3-81-100</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimorusjirl-25</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Trends in (macro)regional integration</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Trends in (macro)regional integration</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>EAEU-India Free Trade Area: Potential Tariff Liberalization Effects for Russia</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Arapova</surname><given-names>E. Ya.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ekaterina Ya. Arapova – PhD (Economics), Director at Centre of sanction politics expertise</p><p>76 Prospect Vernadskogo, 119454, Moscow</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>MGIMO University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Arapova E.Y., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Arapova E.Y.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Arapova E.Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/25">https://polities.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/25</self-uri><abstract><p>In 2017 negotiations on the free trade area between India and the EAEU countries entered an active phase. The negotiations covered such issues as import tar­iff liberalization and the elimination of non-tariff restrictions. The present study aims to quantify the potential impact of mutual tariff liberalization on the dynamics of bilateral trade between Russia and India, in order to develop key principles for Russia’s negoti­ating position (as part of the EAEU), taking its strategic priorities into account. The re­search methodology is based on the SMART partial equilibrium model and a qualitative analysis of modern trends in import demand and the degree of India’s trade protection­ism towards imports from the EAEU countries. The study found that symmetric bilateral tariff liberalization may result in a higher potential increase in Russian exports to India than imports, which will increase the bilateral trade surplus. This is in the interests of Russia, but it hardly meets the strategic interests of India due to its chronic trade deficit. The free trade area may lead to diversification of the commodity component of Russian exports due to the growing export supplies of Russian coal, and, to a lesser extent met­als (aluminum, copper and articles thereof). However, the opportunities to increase the share of hi-tech products in the structure of Russian exports remain limited. The free trade area can become an important tool for strengthening Russian exporters of ferti­lizers, as well as certain categories of agricultural products. In turn, Indian exporters can strengthen their positions on the Russian medicines market, an increase the share of textile products, jewellery, and certain categories of agricultural products. The results can help develop Russia’s positions (as an EAEU member) in multilateral negotiations.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>EAEU</kwd><kwd>Russia</kwd><kwd>India</kwd><kwd>free trade area</kwd><kwd>SMART model</kwd><kwd>econometric analysis</kwd><kwd>tariffs</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ahmad K., Safdar A., Amjad A. 2018. Trade Revenue Implications of Trade Liberalization in Pakistan. MPRA. 23 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ahmad K., Safdar A., Amjad A. 2018. Trade Revenue Implications of Trade Liberalization in Pakistan. MPRA. 23 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Amjadi A., Schuler P., Kuwahara H., Quadros S. 2011. WITS: user's manual. Washington DC: UNCTAD, UNSD, WTO, WB. 187 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amjadi A., Schuler P., Kuwahara H., Quadros S. 2011. WITS: user's manual. Washington DC: UNCTAD, UNSD, WTO, WB. 187 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arapova E.Y. 2018. Determinants of Household Final Consumption Expenditures in Asian Countries: a Panel Model, 1991—2015. Applied Econometrics and International Development. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 121-140.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arapova E.Y. 2018. Determinants of Household Final Consumption Expenditures in Asian Countries: a Panel Model, 1991—2015. Applied Econometrics and International Development. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 121-140.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Armington P. S. 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 159-176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Armington P. S. 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 159-176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baldwin R. E., Lewis W. E., Richardson J.D. 1980. Welfare effects on the United States of a sig­nificant multilateral tariff reduction. Journal of International Economics. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 405-423.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baldwin R. E., Lewis W. E., Richardson J.D. 1980. Welfare effects on the United States of a sig­nificant multilateral tariff reduction. Journal of International Economics. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 405-423.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bhagwati J.N. 1988. Protectionism. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. 147 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bhagwati J.N. 1988. Protectionism. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. 147 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bragina Y.A. 2015. Indiya: novyye cherty ekonomicheskoy politiki [India: New Features of Eco­nomic Policy. Year of the Planet]. God planety. Yezhegodnik. P. 331-341.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bragina Y.A. 2015. Indiya: novyye cherty ekonomicheskoy politiki [India: New Features of Eco­nomic Policy. Year of the Planet]. God planety. Yezhegodnik. P. 331-341.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheong D. 2010. Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration. No. 52. P. 1-36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheong D. 2010. Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration. No. 52. P. 1-36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choudhry S., Kallummal M., Varma P. 2013. Impact of India-ASEAN free trade agreement: a cross-country analysis using applied general equilibrium modelling. New Delhi: Centre for WTO studies. 59 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choudhry S., Kallummal M., Varma P. 2013. Impact of India-ASEAN free trade agreement: a cross-country analysis using applied general equilibrium modelling. New Delhi: Centre for WTO studies. 59 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cline W. R., Kawanabe T.O., Kronsjo M., Williamset T. 1978. Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round: A Quantitative Assessment. Brookings Institution. 314 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cline W. R., Kawanabe T.O., Kronsjo M., Williamset T. 1978. Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round: A Quantitative Assessment. Brookings Institution. 314 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denisov I., Safranchuk I, Bochkov D. 2020. China-India Relations in Eurasia: Historical Legacy and the Changing Global Context. Human Affairs. Vol. 30. P. 224-238.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Denisov I., Safranchuk I, Bochkov D. 2020. China-India Relations in Eurasia: Historical Legacy and the Changing Global Context. Human Affairs. Vol. 30. P. 224-238.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ebrill L., Stotsky J., Gropp R. 1999. Revenue Implications of Trade Liberalization. International Monetary Fund. IMF Occasional Paper No.180. Washington DC, USA. 47 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ebrill L., Stotsky J., Gropp R. 1999. Revenue Implications of Trade Liberalization. International Monetary Fund. IMF Occasional Paper No.180. Washington DC, USA. 47 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feenstra R. 1995. Estimating the Effects of Trade Policy. NBER Working Paper, 5051. P. 2-60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feenstra R. 1995. Estimating the Effects of Trade Policy. NBER Working Paper, 5051. P. 2-60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feenstra R. 2003. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence (2nd ed). Princeton Uni­versity Press. 657 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feenstra R. 2003. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence (2nd ed). Princeton Uni­versity Press. 657 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">FICCI. 2016. India EAEU FTA Survey Report. 32 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">FICCI. 2016. India EAEU FTA Survey Report. 32 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Francois J.F., Martin W. 2004. Commercial Policy Variability, Bindings, and Market Access. European Economic Review. Vol. 48. No. 3. P. 665-679.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Francois J.F., Martin W. 2004. Commercial Policy Variability, Bindings, and Market Access. European Economic Review. Vol. 48. No. 3. P. 665-679.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galishcheva N.V., Nebol'sina E.V. 2021. SSHA i Kitay vo vneshneekonomicheskoy politike In­dii: v poiskakh balansa dlya sokhraneniya strategicheskoy avtonomii [USA and China in India's For­eign Economic Policy: in Search of a Balance for Maintaining Strategic Autonomy]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. No. 2. P. 304-324.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galishcheva N.V., Nebol'sina E.V. 2021. SSHA i Kitay vo vneshneekonomicheskoy politike In­dii: v poiskakh balansa dlya sokhraneniya strategicheskoy avtonomii [USA and China in India's For­eign Economic Policy: in Search of a Balance for Maintaining Strategic Autonomy]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. No. 2. P. 304-324.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goldstein M., Kahn M.S. 1978. The Supply and Demand for Exports: A Simultaneous Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 275-286.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goldstein M., Kahn M.S. 1978. The Supply and Demand for Exports: A Simultaneous Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 275-286.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Greenaway D., Sapsford D. 1994. Exports, growth, and liberalization: An evaluation. Journal of Policy Modeling. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 165-186.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Greenaway D., Sapsford D. 1994. Exports, growth, and liberalization: An evaluation. Journal of Policy Modeling. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 165-186.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Helpman E. 2011. Understanding Global Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 232 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Helpman E. 2011. Understanding Global Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 232 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Houthakker H.S., Magee S.P. 1969. Income and Price Elasticities in World Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 51. P. 111-125.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Houthakker H.S., Magee S.P. 1969. Income and Price Elasticities in World Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 51. P. 111-125.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karingi S., Oulmane N., Lang R. 2005. Assessment of the impact of the economic partnership agreement between the ECOWAS countries and the European Union. Addis Ababa: African Trade Policy Center. 50 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karingi S., Oulmane N., Lang R. 2005. Assessment of the impact of the economic partnership agreement between the ECOWAS countries and the European Union. Addis Ababa: African Trade Policy Center. 50 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kofner Yu. 2020. Liberalizatsiya torgovlis Indiyey dast YEAES 4,6 mlrddollarovyezhegodno [Lib­eralization of Trade with India Will Give the EAEU $ 4.6 billion Annually]. RIAC, Bol'shaya Yevraziya. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kofner Yu. 2020. Liberalizatsiya torgovlis Indiyey dast YEAES 4,6 mlrddollarovyezhegodno [Lib­eralization of Trade with India Will Give the EAEU $ 4.6 billion Annually]. RIAC, Bol'shaya Yevraziya. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Konovalova Y.A. 2017. Rossiya-Indiya: sotrudnichestvo v XXI veke [Russia-India: Cooperation in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. 251 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konovalova Y.A. 2017. Rossiya-Indiya: sotrudnichestvo v XXI veke [Russia-India: Cooperation in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. 251 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krueger A.O. 1998. Why Trade Liberalization is Good for Growth. The Economic Journal. Vol. 08. P. 1513-1522.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krueger A.O. 1998. Why Trade Liberalization is Good for Growth. The Economic Journal. Vol. 08. P. 1513-1522.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P.R. 1979. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade. Journal of International Economics. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 469—479.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P.R. 1979. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade. Journal of International Economics. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 469—479.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lang R. 2006. A partial equilibrium analysis of the impact of the ECOWAS-EU, Economic Part­nership Agreement. Purdue University. 33 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lang R. 2006. A partial equilibrium analysis of the impact of the ECOWAS-EU, Economic Part­nership Agreement. Purdue University. 33 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leamer E.E., Levinsohn J. 1995. International trade theory: The evidence. Handbook of Interna­tional Economics. No. 3. P. 1339—1394.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leamer E.E., Levinsohn J. 1995. International trade theory: The evidence. Handbook of Interna­tional Economics. No. 3. P. 1339—1394.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Likhacheva A.B., Kalachigin G.M. 2018. Otsenka riskov liberalizatsii torgovli so stranami Azii v ramkakh rossiyskoy politiki “Povorota na Vostok” [Assessment of the Risks of Trade Liberalization with Asian Countries in the Framework of the Russian Policy "Turn to the East"]. Vestnik mezhdun­arodnykh organizatsij. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 52—69. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Likhacheva A.B., Kalachigin G.M. 2018. Otsenka riskov liberalizatsii torgovli so stranami Azii v ramkakh rossiyskoy politiki “Povorota na Vostok” [Assessment of the Risks of Trade Liberalization with Asian Countries in the Framework of the Russian Policy "Turn to the East"]. Vestnik mezhdun­arodnykh organizatsij. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 52—69. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lunev S.I. 2020. Rossiya i Indiya v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione i faktor SSHA [Russia and India in theIndo-Pacific Region and the US Factor]. Aktuafnyye problemy Yevropy. No. 1(105). P. 182—212. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunev S.I. 2020. Rossiya i Indiya v Indo-Tikhookeanskom regione i faktor SSHA [Russia and India in theIndo-Pacific Region and the US Factor]. Aktuafnyye problemy Yevropy. No. 1(105). P. 182—212. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malyarov O.V. 2007. Ekonomicheskaya reforma v Indii [Economic Reform in India]. Moscow. 76 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malyarov O.V. 2007. Ekonomicheskaya reforma v Indii [Economic Reform in India]. Moscow. 76 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nenci S. 2011. Tariff Liberalisation and the Growth of World Trade: A Comparative Historical Analysis of the Multilateral Trading System. The World Economy. Vol. 34. No. 10. P. 1809—1835.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nenci S. 2011. Tariff Liberalisation and the Growth of World Trade: A Comparative Historical Analysis of the Multilateral Trading System. The World Economy. Vol. 34. No. 10. P. 1809—1835.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nivedita Das Kundu. 2016. Rossiysko-indiyskiye otnosheniya: proshloye, nastoyashcheye, bu­dushcheye [Russian-Indian Relations: Past, Present, Future]. Mezhdunarodnyj diskussionnyj klub Valdai. 2016. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/rossiysko-indiyskie-otnosheniya/ (ac­cessed: 10.07.2021) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nivedita Das Kundu. 2016. Rossiysko-indiyskiye otnosheniya: proshloye, nastoyashcheye, bu­dushcheye [Russian-Indian Relations: Past, Present, Future]. Mezhdunarodnyj diskussionnyj klub Valdai. 2016. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/rossiysko-indiyskie-otnosheniya/ (ac­cessed: 10.07.2021) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ostry J.D. 1991. Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries: Initial Trade Distortions and Imported Intermediate Inputs. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 447—479.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostry J.D. 1991. Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries: Initial Trade Distortions and Imported Intermediate Inputs. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 447—479.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pant H. 2017. India-Russia Economic and Energy Cooperation: The Way Ahead. RF Issue Brief, June. P. 1-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pant H. 2017. India-Russia Economic and Energy Cooperation: The Way Ahead. RF Issue Brief, June. P. 1-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peters A. 2002. The Fiscal Effects of Tariff Reduction in the Caribbean Community. CARICOM Secretariat. 38 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peters A. 2002. The Fiscal Effects of Tariff Reduction in the Caribbean Community. CARICOM Secretariat. 38 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piermartini R., Teh R. 2005. Demystifying Modelling Methods for Trade Policy. WTO Discus­sion Paper. No. 10. 59 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piermartini R., Teh R. 2005. Demystifying Modelling Methods for Trade Policy. WTO Discus­sion Paper. No. 10. 59 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plummer M.G., Cheong D., Hamanaka S. 2010. Methodology for impact assessment of free trade agreements. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. 120 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plummer M.G., Cheong D., Hamanaka S. 2010. Methodology for impact assessment of free trade agreements. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. 120 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Porter M.E. 1985. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. NY: Free Press. 592 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Porter M.E. 1985. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. NY: Free Press. 592 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose A.K. 2002. Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade? NBER Working Paper, 9273. P. 2-11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose A.K. 2002. Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade? NBER Working Paper, 9273. P. 2-11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salvatore D. 2013. International Economics: Trade and Finance (13th ed). John Wiley &amp; Sons. 836 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salvatore D. 2013. International Economics: Trade and Finance (13th ed). John Wiley &amp; Sons. 836 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sequeira S. 2016. Corruption, trade costs, and gains from tariff liberalization: evidence from Southern Africa. American Economic Review. Vol. 106. No. 10. P. 3029-3063.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sequeira S. 2016. Corruption, trade costs, and gains from tariff liberalization: evidence from Southern Africa. American Economic Review. Vol. 106. No. 10. P. 3029-3063.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shikin V., Bhandari A. 2017. Russia — India Energy Cooperation: Trade, Joint Projects, and New Areas. Policy Brief. RIAC and Gateway House. 37 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shikin V., Bhandari A. 2017. Russia — India Energy Cooperation: Trade, Joint Projects, and New Areas. Policy Brief. RIAC and Gateway House. 37 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singh R., Sharma S.P. 2017. India — Eurasian Economic Union Relations. Fortifying Trade and Tourism Prospects. PHD Research Bureau. 13 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singh R., Sharma S.P. 2017. India — Eurasian Economic Union Relations. Fortifying Trade and Tourism Prospects. PHD Research Bureau. 13 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sinha A. 2019. A theory of reform consolidation in India: From crisis-induced reforms to stra­tegic internationalization. India Review. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 54—87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sinha A. 2019. A theory of reform consolidation in India: From crisis-induced reforms to stra­tegic internationalization. India Review. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 54—87.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">SIPRI. 2021. Trends in International Arms Transfers. Strategy for New India 75. 2019. Niti Aayng.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">SIPRI. 2021. Trends in International Arms Transfers. Strategy for New India 75. 2019. Niti Aayng.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trefler D. 1993. Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Economet­ric Study of U.S. Import Policy. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 101. P. 138—160.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trefler D. 1993. Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Economet­ric Study of U.S. Import Policy. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 101. P. 138—160.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valuyeva I.A., Konovalova YU.A. 2018. Voyenno-tekhnicheskoye sotrudnichestvo dvukh regional'nykh derzhav: novyye vyzovy dlya Rossii i Indii [Military-Technical Cooperation between Two Regional Powers: New Challenges for Russia and India]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Ekonomika. No. 1(26). P. 28-37. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valuyeva I.A., Konovalova YU.A. 2018. Voyenno-tekhnicheskoye sotrudnichestvo dvukh regional'nykh derzhav: novyye vyzovy dlya Rossii i Indii [Military-Technical Cooperation between Two Regional Powers: New Challenges for Russia and India]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Ekonomika. No. 1(26). P. 28-37. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Viner J. 1961. The Customs Union Issue. Washington DC: Anderson Kramer Associates. 247 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Viner J. 1961. The Customs Union Issue. Washington DC: Anderson Kramer Associates. 247 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang Q. 2001. Import-Reducing Effect of Trade Barriers: a Cross-Country Investigation. IMF Working Paper, 1216. 53 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang Q. 2001. Import-Reducing Effect of Trade Barriers: a Cross-Country Investigation. IMF Working Paper, 1216. 53 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vinokurov E. Yu. (ed.) 2017. Yevraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz [Eurasian Economic Union]. St. Petersburg: EDB Center for Integration Studies. 287 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vinokurov E. Yu. (ed.) 2017. Yevraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz [Eurasian Economic Union]. St. Petersburg: EDB Center for Integration Studies. 287 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zakharov A. 2019. The Geopolitics of the US-India-Russia Strategic Triangle. Strategic Analysis. Vol. 43. No. 5. P. 357-371.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakharov A. 2019. The Geopolitics of the US-India-Russia Strategic Triangle. Strategic Analysis. Vol. 43. No. 5. P. 357-371.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zakharov A.I. 2018. Regional'nye aspekty rossijsko-indijskikh otnoshenij [Regional Aspects of Russian- Indian Relations]. Vestnik Instituta vostokovedeniya RAN. No. 6. P. 109-115. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakharov A.I. 2018. Regional'nye aspekty rossijsko-indijskikh otnoshenij [Regional Aspects of Russian- Indian Relations]. Vestnik Instituta vostokovedeniya RAN. No. 6. P. 109-115. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zakharov A.I. 2020. Vstupleniye Indii v global'nyy mir: osobennosti puti [India's Entry into the Global World: Features of the Path]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. No. 2. P. 113-134. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakharov A.I. 2020. Vstupleniye Indii v global'nyy mir: osobennosti puti [India's Entry into the Global World: Features of the Path]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. No. 2. P. 113-134. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zakharov А. 2017. Exploring New Drivers in India-Russia Cooperation. RF Occasional Paper. 34 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakharov А. 2017. Exploring New Drivers in India-Russia Cooperation. RF Occasional Paper. 34 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
